Next: Using gettextized software, Previous: Charset conversion in gettext, Up: Message catalogs with gettext

##### 8.2.1.5 How to use `gettext` in GUI programs

One place where the `gettext` functions, if used normally, have big problems is within programs with graphical user interfaces (GUIs). The problem is that many of the strings which have to be translated are very short. They have to appear in pull-down menus which restricts the length. But strings which are not containing entire sentences or at least large fragments of a sentence may appear in more than one situation in the program but might have different translations. This is especially true for the one-word strings which are frequently used in GUI programs.

As a consequence many people say that the `gettext` approach is wrong and instead `catgets` should be used which indeed does not have this problem. But there is a very simple and powerful method to handle these kind of problems with the `gettext` functions.

As an example consider the following fictional situation. A GUI program has a menu bar with the following entries:

         +------------+------------+--------------------------------------+
         | File       | Printer    |                                      |
         +------------+------------+--------------------------------------+
         | Open     | | Select   |
         | New      | | Open     |
         +----------+ | Connect  |
                      +----------+

To have the strings `File`, `Printer`, `Open`, `New`, `Select`, and `Connect` translated there has to be at some point in the code a call to a function of the `gettext` family. But in two places the string passed into the function would be `Open`. The translations might not be the same and therefore we are in the dilemma described above.

One solution to this problem is to artificially enlengthen the strings to make them unambiguous. But what would the program do if no translation is available? The enlengthened string is not what should be printed. So we should use a little bit modified version of the functions.

To enlengthen the strings a uniform method should be used. E.g., in the example above the strings could be chosen as

         Menu|File
         Menu|Printer
         Menu|File|Open
         Menu|File|New
         Menu|Printer|Select
         Menu|Printer|Open
         Menu|Printer|Connect

Now all the strings are different and if now instead of `gettext` the following little wrapper function is used, everything works just fine:

           char *
           sgettext (const char *msgid)
           {
             char *msgval = gettext (msgid);
             if (msgval == msgid)
               msgval = strrchr (msgid, '|') + 1;
             return msgval;
           }

What this little function does is to recognize the case when no translation is available. This can be done very efficiently by a pointer comparison since the return value is the input value. If there is no translation we know that the input string is in the format we used for the Menu entries and therefore contains a `|` character. We simply search for the last occurrence of this character and return a pointer to the character following it. That's it!

If one now consistently uses the enlengthened string form and replaces the `gettext` calls with calls to `sgettext` (this is normally limited to very few places in the GUI implementation) then it is possible to produce a program which can be internationalized.

With advanced compilers (such as GNU C) one can write the `sgettext` functions as an inline function or as a macro like this:

         #define sgettext(msgid) \
           ({ const char *__msgid = (msgid);            \
              char *__msgstr = gettext (__msgid);       \
              if (__msgval == __msgid)                  \
                __msgval = strrchr (__msgid, '|') + 1;  \
              __msgval; })

The other `gettext` functions (`dgettext`, `dcgettext` and the `ngettext` equivalents) can and should have corresponding functions as well which look almost identical, except for the parameters and the call to the underlying function.

Now there is of course the question why such functions do not exist in the GNU C Library? There are two parts of the answer to this question.

- They are easy to write and therefore can be provided by the project they are used in. This is not an answer by itself and must be seen together with the second part which is:
- There is no way the C library can contain a version which can work everywhere. The problem is the selection of the character to separate the prefix from the actual string in the enlenghtened string. The examples above used `|` which is a quite good choice because it resembles a notation frequently used in this context and it also is a character not often used in message strings.

  But what if the character is used in message strings. Or if the chose character is not available in the character set on the machine one compiles (e.g., `|` is not required to exist for ISO C; this is why the `iso646.h` file exists in ISO C programming environments).

There is only one more comment to make left. The wrapper function above require that the translations strings are not enlengthened themselves. This is only logical. There is no need to disambiguate the strings (since they are never used as keys for a search) and one also saves quite some memory and disk space by doing this.